• Language
    • ENGLISH
    • GERMAN
    • SPANISH
    • FRENCH
    • ITALIAN
    • JAPANESE
    • PORTUGUESE
    • CHINESE
    • RUSSIAN

Get your own Little Black Book.

Build your own personal news stream. Discover the latest work created that interests you, share your favourite stories and follow your favourite people and companies

Already have an account?

The Influencers

Can Positive Charity Ads Have More Impact?

INFLUENCER: System1's Will Goodhand on why 'Not for Profit' ads should use happiness

Can Positive Charity Ads Have More Impact?

Since 2017 we have been recording, analysing and tracking every ad released in the UK and US in the not-for-profit sector (other sectors, of course, are available). We predict both short-term sales spikes and long-term brand building based on the performance of the ad. Because of my work with SURF Survivors Fund in Rwanda, this area has interested me greatly since we started, but it’s been disappointing to see that non-profit advertising is consistently one of the worst performers across sectors for long-term growth.

But why is that? Is it a budgetary issue? Are creative agencies using juniors too often for the creative? I don’t think that’s true. I think the issue lies with the historic use of shocking and upsetting imagery to break through consumer apathy in order to get that donation. And if you look at the short-term sales spikes for NFP ads that becomes much clearer.

This year’s Save the Children Pneumonia Appeal ad is a good example of this. It is a touching and powerful ad that provides an insight into the pneumonia crisis in Kenya. It scored significantly for short-term sales spike and will surely have resulted in an influx of donations for the campaign, most likely being considered an effective ad for the charity. Similarly, Barnardo’s advert from this year, a tragic story of online grooming also scored significant short-term sales spike. However, in both cases, each ad scored only 1 star for long-term effectiveness. There are arguments that in both cases, the ads are created to sure in donations, and I also predict this is exactly what they did. Is there a way to increase donations and also accelerate long-term brand building that will potentially provide continuing positive impact for a charity?

If we look at the other end of the scale the two best performing charity ads in the UK in terms of brand growth over the past two years are Angela’s Results ad from the Cancer Research and Animal Journalist from Battersea Dogs and Cats Home. Both of these ads scored 5 stars for long-term brand building, and not insignificant short-term sales spikes.

Animal Journalists, part of a longer campaign from the charity since 2018, is humorous and there is not a single shot of a distressed animal - instead, we are treated to playful and fun framing of dogs and cats. When we look at the short-term sales spike, it’s 22% lower than the Save the Children’s Pneumonia Appeal ad, but still performs better than more than half of all non-for-profit ads for this metric.

The Cancer Research ad, Angela’s Results focuses on someone getting the news that their cancer is in remission. It’s a short bomb of extreme relief and happiness. And for short-term sales spike it was more effective than 90% of NFP ads in the last two years, and only 8% less effective for this metric than the Save the Children ad.

Emotional advertising campaigns are generally more profitable for long-term growth. This data shows that how those emotions are applied to creative will have different results for an organisation. What’s important to understand for charities is that it is possible to get that short-term donation spike, but at the same time ensure that you are positively building your brand for the future.



Will Goodhand is director System1

Sign up to our newsletters and stay up to date with the best work and breaking ad news from around the world.